Assistant Professor, PhD., “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Social Work, Journalism, Public Relations and Sociology, Chair of Sociology and Social Work, Romania;
Published on December 29, 2019
Scientific and technological development goes hand in hand and has always sustained mankind, being the sources of a better living for humans. Until recent years, people were the ones that coordinated and maneuvered machines or production chains, used telephones or droved cars, which only operated as tools, according to their handlers will. This scenario is nowadays less obvious, and devices are currently less subordinated to man manipulation. They become smart, record and share information, decide to act or communicate, simulating human behavior, independent from a human decider.
All the above-mentioned issues are considered facets of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, as defined by the leader of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, in Davos. Economists and politicians, social scientists and engineers, innovators and conformists regard such never met before transformations with both hope and skepticism, identifying benefits, risks and challenges. In the following pages we will radiography the key sectors impacted by the fourth industrial revolution, analyzing several perspectives regarding it and emphasizing the main areas of interest for social sciences.
Industrial Revolution, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, Social Change, Human Centricity.
- National Academy of Science and Engineering – ACATECH, Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative industrie 4.0. final report of the industrie 4.0 working group. Frankfurt, 2013.
- Klaus Scwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Enciclopedia Britanica, 250th Anniversary, retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-2119734.
- Neil Gershenfeld, J.P. Vasseur, As Objects Go Online: The Promise (and Pitfalls) of the Internet of Things, retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2014-02-12/objects-go-online, 2014.
- Alexandra Porumbescu, The Globalization Debate. From “The great Voyages of Discovery” to Post Communism, in “Revista de Ştiinţe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques”, no. 58/2018.
- Oxford Dictionary, https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/artificial_intelligence.
- Michael A. Gigante, Virtual Reality: Definitions, History and Applications, Virtual Reality Systems, Academic Press, 1993, pp. 3-14, retrieved from https:/ /www.sciencedirect.com /science/article/ pii/B9780122277481500093.
- David Romero, Johan Stahre, Thorsten Wuest, Ovidiu Noran, Peter Bernus, Asa Fast Berlung, Dominic Gorecky, Towards an Operator 4.0 Typology: A Human-centric Perspective on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies, CIE Proceedings, 2016, Tianjin, China.
- MinHwa Lee, JinHyo Joseph Yun, Andreas Pyka, DongKyu Won, Fumio Kodama, Giovanni Schiuma, HangSik Park, Jeonghwan Jeon, KyungBae Park, KwangHo Jung, Min-Ren Ya, SamYoul Lee, Xiaofei Zhao, How to Respond to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Second Information Technology Revolution? Dynamic New Combinations between Technology, Market, and Society through Open Innovation, Journal of Open Innovation: technology, Market and Complexity, 4, 21, 2018.
- Marshall Romney, Paul Steinbartx, Accounting Information Systems, New York, Pearson, 2018.
- Konstantinos Pouliakas, Machines, robots and the threat of automation to EU jobs, retrieved from https://skillspanorama.cedefop.europa.eu/en/blog/machines-robots-and-threat-automation-eu-jobs
- Livia Pogan, Changing work values in a liquid world, in “Sociology and Social Work Review”, 3/2019.
- Alla Kravchenko, Iryna Kyzymenko, The Forth Industrial Revolution: New Paradigm of Society Development or Posthumanist Manifesto, Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 22, 2019.