Gheorghe DĂNIŞOR
Prof. dr., chercheur scientifique de premier degré, l’Institut de Recherche pour les Sciences Socio-Humaines ”C. S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor”, Académie Roumaine, Craiova;
E-mail: gheorghedănisor@gmail.com
Abstract
On a metaphysical level, the concept of “passage” is problematic. Therefore, in this analysis we put into question numerous times this term. The word “passage” is used because we have no other to designate this reality which, in its transition into something else, does not disappear, actually. This dificulty is felt, it seems, to Hegel, because neither he failed to adequately express the paradox of the passage that does not pass. The solution can come from the deduction of this paradox significance from the Greek meaning of “theoria” (contemplation, sophia), which contains in itself two terms that mean the same thing: theo-passer and reo-passer, which could be expressed as the passage of the passage, ie, the location in the divine (Thea).
Keywords
multiple, passage, beyond, metaphysics, logic, phenomenology.